Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination Henri Tajfel PDF – Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. Experiments in Intergroup Discriminati. ON. MATRIX by Henri Tajfel. B. MATRIX 3. MATRIX 4. U. Intergroup discrimination is a feature logical causation. In The. Exp eriments in Intergroup Discrimination. Can cliscrimination be trctced to by Flenri Tajfel .. problem lvas to create experimental con- didons that would.

Author: Tanos Yozuru
Country: Tanzania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 15 September 2017
Pages: 372
PDF File Size: 8.75 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.32 Mb
ISBN: 321-8-43166-693-1
Downloads: 69477
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Marg

The experiments carried out by Tajfel clearly demonstrate that inter-group discrimination is easy to trigger off.

Intergroup Discrimination and the Henri Tajfel Experiments. A participant was not allowed to award money to himself.

The subject also did not know the identity of any member of either group. Tajfel et al argue that, before any discrimination can occur, people must be categorised as members of an in-group or an out-group, but more significantly the very act of categorisation by itself produces conflict and discrimination.

Psychological theories which attempt to explain the origins of prejudice fall into two major categories. The value of each point they were rewarding was a tenth of a penny.

Even more interestingly though, the boys were found to be more concerned with creating as large a difference as possible between the amounts allocated to each group in favour of their own groupthen in gaining a greater amount for everybody, across the two groups. Take it with you wherever you go. Sources Most of this article is based on this article: However, many psychologists have demonstrated that conflict is not inevitable. Want to stay up to date?


Intergroup Discrimination experiments Henri Tajfel

The boys were required to make three types of choice. In this experiment matrices were employed which allowed the experimenters to investigate three variables. In the second experiment, the experimenters are interested in the strategy adopted by the boys, when allocating points. Social identity theory argues that the boys favoured their own group because it increases their self-esteem. This article is a part of the guide: Tajfel infers that this is in itself an obvious form of discrimination caused by the segregation or categorisation.

Intergroup discrimination refers to the phenomenon where factions of a single group develop conflicts against each other as by-products of competition and prejudice.

Experimnets social itnergroup theory has become one of the main theories in European social psychology. It should be noted that for each box, within the matrix, there was another that held its inverse. The Social Construction of Reality.

In the experimental condition, the participants were given a matrix where the top row contained the amounts they will be awarding to a fellow group member, and the bottom row contained amounts that will be awarded to members of the other group. This page was last modified on 29 Juneat There were six matrices, repeated three times; one for each of the three conditions.


The subjects had to indicate their choices by ticking one box in each matrix.

This was then related to the stereotypes that existed for our own immigrants and their British-born children. Check out our quiz-page with tests about: The second experiment also clearly demonstrated that the most important factor in making their choices was maximising the differences between the two groups.

The subjects were taken to separate cubicles and told which group they were in.

The subjects were 64 boys, 14 and 15 years old from a comprehensive school in a suburb of Bristol. Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination by Tajfel H.

The second experiment was very similar to the first.

Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.

Intergroup discrimination was the strategy used in making intergroup choices. Four groups of 8 served in each of the two conditions. Framework Convention on National minorities. Retrieved from ” http: The First Experiment under-estimators and over-estimators. However, within a group, conflicts mostly root from psychological prejudice then developing into a more serious form of intergroup discrimination.

Related articles Related pages: