Sobre Quine e sua Epistemologia. Exposición una aproximación a la epistemología naturalizada. 8 years ago. 4, views · ARTIGO: Critica de Jonh Locke. Contemporary discussions of NE tend to take as their starting point Quine’s seminal paper, “Epistemology Naturalized”. Before. Sin embargo, reclamó para la epistemología naturalizada la pretensión De esta forma, Quine se empeñaba en asumir, contra lo supuesto por muchos de sus.

Author: Kitaxe JoJozahn
Country: Colombia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 6 September 2004
Pages: 433
PDF File Size: 18.6 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.47 Mb
ISBN: 922-9-76888-960-8
Downloads: 26659
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigashicage

The Armchair or the Laboratory? For epistemllogia, well-known experimental findings—e. Feminist Essays on Reason and ObjectivityBoulder: Oxford University Press, pp. More generally, we need some respectable version of traditional philosophical methods reflecting on cases, consulting our intuitions, and so onor of alternative methods closely approximating them. Examples here would include accounts of knowledge or justification in terms of causation Goldmanreliability ArmstrongGoldmanPapineauKornblithnatural functions Graham ntauralizada, Millikaninformation theory Dretskeor some kind of nomic or counterfactual dependence Nozick Whether episstemologia finds the preceding account of the grounding of epistemic normativity satisfactory will depend largely upon how one conceives of epistemic normativity, even normativity generally, to begin with.

Artuso – – Filosofia 40 3: Husserl, Edmund,Logische Untersuchungen. Naturalization of epistemology does not jettison the normative and settle for the indiscriminate description of ongoing procedures.

Science Logic and Mathematics.

Naturalism in Epistemology

Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibilit y, Oxford: QuineWiley-Blackwell, pp. One obvious response is that this begs the question. And so too for those who favor NE: See, for instance, the various papers in the aforementioned Roth and Galis volume.


Naturalism in epistemology, as elsewhere, has a long history. Reprinted in Science, Perception, and RealityLondon: Others, on the other hand, may doubt whether TE itself has ever been able to provide any entirely unconditional recommendations e.

Also worth noting here are a pair of more strictly meta-epistemological desiderata Goldman announces at the start of the episgemologia paper. In none of this was the goal to be faithful to actual psychology. This final section briefly describes three further such areas —social epistemology, feminist epistemology, and the debate over epistemic rationality.

Clearly, this does not involve or require any a priori insight on my part; it simply reflects some easily gotten knowledge about the relevant local fauna. And in his Epistemology and Cognitionfor example, Goldman appears to regard the conceptual analysis and consulting of intuitions that he sees as essential to epistemology as itself a priori see B The epistemological enterprise needs appropriate help from science, especially the science of the mind.

As Goldman notes Moreover, there is the concern that such constraints, if consistently epistemolofia, would be rarely if ever be satisfied.

A. Ros, Epistemología Naturalizada en Quine – PhilPapers

However, some may find even this still too contingent a ground upon which to base epistemic norms. The point in this part of the work is that this distinction is important for a scientific theory can make predictions in a satisfactory way.

But Locke, for example, is more consistently optimistic. Against this, it is suggested that the concept of knowledge is of little if any theoretical interest; it is no more the proper target of epistemological epistemollgia than the concept of aluminum is a worthy target of inquiry for one trying to understand various metals.


Other Topics and Approaches 6. Further, some critics have contended that externalism is, as such, ill-equipped to provide useful guidance to epistemic agents, at least of the first-personal reason-guiding variety. Why not just see how this construction really proceeds?

And Rysiew argues that Reid does not neatly separate psychological facts from epistemic norms. The trouble with many philosophical treatments of knowledge is that they are inspired by Cartesian-like conceptions of justification or vindication. Services on Demand Article. University of Minnesota Press. This recalls, of course, meta-epistemic NE Section 1. This is not the kind of principle I seek; for, even if it is correct, it leaves unexplained why a person who senses redly and believes that he does, believes this justifiably.

On a reliabilist view, the legitimacy of the relevant principles of reasoning—what makes them good principles—is a function of whether they are, in fact, reliable. Some social epistemologists maintain a view of the individual as the primary locus of epistemic achievement, for example, while others treat entities other than individuals, such as groups or corporations, as having epistemic properties.

Traditionalists often regard these facts as necessary truths, and it is their necessity that enables evidentialists to endorse the supervenience thesis.

University of California Press. Open access to epistemoloia SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Section 1; and Janack n.