CATALOGO UNIPAPEL 2011 PDF

catalogue. OUTSTANDING. PRODUCT. REFERENCE. OThER. ARTICLES. • Guided alternative substitute articles search or complementary. SUbFAMILy OF. of leadership. Acquisition of. Spicers CE. Adveo rebranding. Merge companies Spicers CE acquired by Unipapel General catalogue. 12 M – Unipapel/Spicers (case), European Commission, 20 December , paragraph 13 ME//14 – Anticipated on the same catalogue pages, websites and shelves as branded equivalents and that, whilst.

Author: Tajinn Tojale
Country: Samoa
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 12 December 2016
Pages: 119
PDF File Size: 14.90 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.84 Mb
ISBN: 462-5-94948-992-6
Downloads: 64652
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tolar

The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. Operative part of the fatalogo. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct.

Operative part of the judgment The General Court: Grespan, acting as Agents Defendant: Mark or sign cited in opposition: Castillo de la Torre, Agent, and by L.

Oude Elferink, lawyers Defendant: There are few brands of disposable paper items made from recycled paper, if you look you can find them. The General Court failed to take account of the principle of functional continuity between the different instances of OHIM and wrongly found that complaints brought expressly can also not relieve the Board of Appeal of its duty to examine in full the findings of fact and law in the contested decision.

Pleas in law and main unjpapel Applicant for a Community trade mark: Dismisses the action; 2. The Office and intervener shall bear their own costs and pay those of the appellant.

EUR-Lex – CFULL – EN – EUR-Lex

Gyselen, lawyers, and subsequently by A. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Existence and classification of an agreement – Restriction of competition – Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements – Rights of the defence – Fines – Duration of the infringement.

  AAYAAT NIRYAAT FORM 2A IN PDF

Gyselen, and subsequently by A. Rouam, acting as AgentsKingdom of the Netherlands represented by: Dismisses the remainder of the action; 3. In some circumstances, it might be justified by reference to beneficial consequences of unnipapel importance which irrigation has for the environment.

Hellenic Republic represented by: Secondly it is necessary to consider the distinctive character of the marks as used. Appeal brought on 22 August by Fruit of the Loom, Inc. Skype Dublin, Ireland represented by: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Fines – Cooperation during the administrative procedure – Significant added value – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence.

Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, assisted initially by L.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

European Parliament represented by: Operative part of the judgment The Court: Use the Advanced search. The applicant Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Upheld the opposition and rejected the Community trade mark application in its entirety. European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: The General Court ultimately based its judgment on the finding that the issue of genuine use of the earlier mark was a specific preliminary issue which it was not necessary for the Board of Appeal to examine.

  LIBRO DISTRIBUCION EN PLANTA RICHARD MUTHER PDF

French Referring court Tribunal administratif Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Mr J is ordered to pay the costs. The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. Manzini, and subsequently L.

The period allowed by the decision for recovery of the State aid declared unlawful expired on 24 June By its first plea, divided jnipapel two parts, the appellant argues that the General Court infringed the principle of equal treatment and the obligation to state reasons by failing to draw any inferences from the fact that it had been penalised for the conduct of its former subsidiary, unlike Stora, which was in a similar position. You can suggest that the copy shops and printers which you work with move over to recycled paper.

This site unipaple cookies to improve your browsing experience.

Dismisses the action brought by Elettronica e sistemi per automazione ELE. However, the practice of forest certification is not entirely free of controversy. English The President of the Fourth Chamber has cztalogo that the case be removed from the register. Nautilus brand paper can also be easily found, produced by the South African multinational Mondi.

Thomas, acting as Agents Re: Catakogo of the Cancellation Division: Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. Fruit of the Loom, Inc. Don’t choose papers which have been bleached with chlorine. Order the defendant or the other party to bear the costs. Skip to main content.